Thursday, October 4, 2007

South Tower Anomalies

Duration: 04:26 minutes
Upload Time: 07-06-18 09:26:25
User: ThoughtCrime7
:::: Favorites
:::: Top Videos of Day
Description:

Original NBC 911 footage of South Tower hit is analyzed. 3 videos on the SAME network from the SAME angle depicting the SAME moment in time tell 3 DIFFERENT stories.

Comments

Vierotchka ::: Favorites
I was watching CNN International on 9/11, watching the live feed as they were showing the north tower and talking about an accident, and then the south tower was hit - there definitely was a plane that hit the south tower. From where they were shooting it, the airplane came in from the right side of the screen. Still, your video is interesting. It's another mystery piece in the puzzle.
07-08-27 19:15:57
__________________________________________________
911wasasickjoke ::: Favorites
You're welcome.
07-08-20 17:07:20
__________________________________________________
ThoughtCrime7 ::: Favorites
Good info - thanks! : )
07-08-20 16:50:33
__________________________________________________
911wasasickjoke ::: Favorites
Bsregistration and ghengis have done a good job of demonstrating that the "amateur" videos have been doctored too. I've been watching the archives and I've found some serious flaws in most of the eyewitness testimony. In the case of ABC, CNN and NBC the first phone in eyewitnesses all worked the respective media outlets and in CBS' case it was the wife of a CBS producer. It appears there were quite a few fake eyewitnesses in NYC and DC. internetarchive dot org-sept 11th TV archive. take care
07-08-18 22:27:44
__________________________________________________
ThoughtCrime7 ::: Favorites
True. I think it's because people saw lots of footage on TV of planes crashing in NY, but none at the Pentagon. All I can conclude with any certainty is that the news footgage of WTC planes was faked. The amateur video and eyewitness evidence of planes in NY is hard to discount. That's all I know for sure now but the research goes on...
07-08-18 18:34:08
__________________________________________________
911wasasickjoke ::: Favorites
Thanks for the info. it's interesting how many will be ok with the idea that a commercial airliner didn't hit the Pentagon but the idea of no jetliners at WTC is abhorrent to them.
07-08-17 22:46:17
__________________________________________________
ThoughtCrime7 ::: Favorites
That's how they did the pentagon. Real plane, no strike. It flew over before the missile hit. That's why eye witnesses saw a plane, but the trajectory they describe is not what's in the official report. If you haven't seen it, "Pentagon 9/11 Eyewitnesses" at Google Video is excellent.
07-08-17 20:50:54
__________________________________________________
911wasasickjoke ::: Favorites
Tis true-there were lots of weird aircraft flying around that morning including the white jet seen at all three crash locales-probably some flybys to confuse people-"I saw the jet go on the other side of the building and then there was an explosion"
07-08-17 14:57:35
__________________________________________________
ThoughtCrime7 ::: Favorites
I hear ya. You don't have to be a "no planes" theorist to be a "tv fakery" theorist. The tv fakery could simply have been done to disguise non-civillian modified aircraft, or to hide explosions timed with the plane strikes, or to hide other aircraft in the area, or whatever. The fact is there was tv fakery and the truth movement should use that evidence to help their case for media complicity. You don't have to be a "no-planer" to see the fakery.
07-08-17 14:49:43
__________________________________________________
911wasasickjoke ::: Favorites
Great job! I can't believe that people would still try to find fault with the TV fakery when the news footage clearly proves it and when you check it out for yourself at the archives it really stares you in the face. And yet when I mentioned no-planes at WTC to a friend who is actively and sincerely involved in 9-11 activism/research the first he said wa "you mean disinformation?'
07-08-17 12:56:05
__________________________________________________

No comments: