Duration: 10:49 minutes Upload Time: 07-06-29 20:03:38 User: lucretius1 :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: This is a video podcast I made for the podcast I run, The Big Bang and Creationism (my homepage can be found at lucretius1.blogspot.com/) It goes over the history of our universe, with some nice visuals, mostly courtesy of Wikipedia and the Hubble Space Telescope gallery site. I had to split it into two parts. This is part 1. Part two can be found: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RHfUFljTmw |
|
Comments | |
sluimers ::: Favorites Rkirt, I don't know about lucretius1, but I certainly would use the same methods as science to convince people to believe in creationism. In fact, if there is a God or Intelligent Designer, or whatever is the popular word for a universe creator I would love to prove it. I'll bet lucretius1 would do so too, though he's obviously already convinced there isn't. 07-09-24 06:44:34 __________________________________________________ | |
sluimers ::: Favorites Thank you. That really clears things up for me. 07-09-24 06:33:58 __________________________________________________ | |
BYONDTer13 ::: Favorites I'm religious, and I still prefer to hear "well, I'm not sure, but this could be..." rather than: "You cannot know for sure, and all the evidence cannot be comprehended by mortals, but you should have faith." ...Yeah... Go on? Clearly you are intelligent enough to realize these are all theories, why not AVOID making an ass of yourself? 07-09-24 04:19:23 __________________________________________________ | |
Rkirt ::: Favorites You propose as facts theory that is defined by time that cannot be counted and distances that cannot be measured. Then continue on as if this is undisputable and scientific proof. How would you go about convincing people to believe in creationism? Would you use the same methods as you do with your "science"? 07-09-23 15:33:14 __________________________________________________ | |
lucretius1 ::: Favorites The black part = we don't know quite yet (this is for quantum gravity to solve.) Line thickness means nothing. I don't like string theory that much, but quantum gravity yes (I just prefer Loop Quantum Gravity). Every quantum gravitational theory I've seen does predict a Big Bounce, so it really just comes with the territory. 07-09-23 13:11:38 __________________________________________________ | |
lucretius1 ::: Favorites The unification of the forces is discovered by a basic prediction of what is known as Grand Unification Theory. It shows that, at higher temperatures, the gauge bosons (carrier particles of the ofrces) all behave in the same manner. We can extend this by quantum gravity (so that gravity is now quantum) and show it too ends up behaving the same way at an even higher temperature. 07-09-23 13:09:34 __________________________________________________ | |
sluimers ::: Favorites I'm not a quantum physicist or cosmologist or whatever, I'm not that smart. :/ So could you answer some questions for me? Regarding the image of the forces being created. How do you know those forces were united and did not start to stand upon themselves? Does the thickness of the line say anything? Why is the electromagnetic force black in the beginning? Do you believe in string theory? quantum gravity? big bounce? That's it for now. 07-09-23 12:45:56 __________________________________________________ | |
46Hirushima ::: Favorites ...i don't get it 07-09-23 06:56:53 __________________________________________________ | |
chimstership ::: Favorites exactly 07-09-23 02:50:48 __________________________________________________ | |
elsewherebeats1 ::: Favorites Big Bang Theory-GOD SPOKE AND 'BANG' IT HAPPENED!!! 07-09-22 21:41:19 __________________________________________________ |
Monday, September 24, 2007
An Introduction to the Big Bang Theory (Part 1)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment